Letter to the article of Jiang et al.

Reply to the letter to the editor regarding our article (paganelli et Al., 2010).

T the Editor: The letter to the editor sent by representatives of Monsanto, Syngenta, and Dow Chemicals (among others) to Chem. Res. Toxicol. regarding our paper (Paganelli et al., published July 23, 2010) and the tone used in their criticism about other research papers studying glyphosate effects should come as no surprise considering the obvious conflicts of interest inherent in this work whe...

Letter to the editor regarding the article by paganelli et Al.

Response to letter of Vahle et al.

several important points that deserve comment. The primary objective of our paper was to report the results of a standard two-year rat carcinogenicity study conducted with recombinant full-length human PTH (1-84) to comply with international regulatory guidelines. Dr. Vahle et al. are correct that our study did not directly compare the carcinogenic potential of PTH (1-84) and PTH (1-34), that i...

Letter to the Editor Regarding the Article “ Suicidal Death by Nicotine Poisoning ” by Jun et al .

The recent report by Jun et al. [1] is valuable in that it highlighted nicotine as a lethal toxic chemical, which can be used for suicide. A 20-year-old man who was a non-smoker and had no disease history was found dead in a head-down position on his bed in his room in the morning by his mother. Through meticulous investigation, death scene investigators found a drug bottle outside the window (...

A Letter to the Editor on the Article by Farnam et al.−Author's Response

We greatly appreciate the comments of Dr. Rutte et al. regarding our recent study on the effectiveness of sexual counseling models in health care [1]. We agree with them that to find a more cost-effective alternative for standard models, such as Permission, Limited Information, Specific Suggestions, and Intensive Therapy (PLISSIT), we should perform a costeffectiveness study. We will need furth...